The Elite Gourmet EJX600 and the Omega VRT350 are both slow, single-auger masticating juicers, but they land at very different price points. The EJX600 sells for around $43 while the VRT350 costs closer to $200, a gap that shapes nearly every tradeoff between them. With over 5,300 ratings the EJX600 has a large base of user feedback, while the VRT350 has earned 1,500 ratings and a notably higher 4.3-star average. Choosing between the two comes down to how serious you are about juicing and how much you want to spend to get there.
Budget shoppers get real slow-juicer performance from the EJX600 at $43, but the Omega VRT350 earns its higher price with a better rating, more power, and dual-speed control for anyone juicing daily.
| Spec | Elite Gourmet EJX600 Masticating Juicer | Omega VRT350 Masticating Juicer |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $42.99 | $199.87 |
| Rating | ||
| Power | 100 W | 150 W |
| Speeds | 1 | 2 |
| Jar / bowl material | Bpa-Free, Stainless Steel, Tritan | Stainless Steel |
| Blade material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Finish | Polished | Silver |
| Color | Black | Silver |
| Voltage | 120.0 | 110 Volts |
The Elite Gourmet EJX600 is a compact vertical masticating juicer priced at $42.99 with a 3.9-star rating across 5,310 reviews. It runs on 100 watts with a single speed and a 16-ounce juice cup made from BPA-free Tritan and stainless steel. Its footprint is just 3.25 by 3.25 by 12 inches, making it easy to store in tight kitchens. The stainless steel blade and polished black finish round out a machine that punches above its price class for light to moderate use.
Buy this if: ['Someone new to slow juicing who wants to try the category without committing more than $45.', 'A small household that juices a few times a week and needs something compact that fits on a crowded counter.', 'A buyer who values a huge real-world review base and accepts a slightly lower average rating in exchange for a very low price.']
Check price on Amazon
The Omega VRT350 is a vertical slow juicer priced at $199.87 with a 4.3-star rating from 1,500 reviewers. It runs at 150 watts and offers two speed settings, giving you more control over soft versus hard produce. The juicer weighs 18 pounds and is built with stainless steel components throughout, including the auger and juice bowl. It operates on 110 volts and carries a finish that has held up well for the large number of long-term owners reflected in its review count.
Buy this if: ['A daily juicer who wants more control, with two speed settings to handle everything from soft citrus to dense root vegetables.', 'Someone who prioritizes long-term durability and is willing to pay $200 for a heavier, well-reviewed machine with a 4.3-star average.', 'A household that juices large batches regularly and wants the extra 50 watts and build quality that the Omega VRT350 provides over the EJX600.']
Check price on AmazonIf budget is the main concern, yes. The EJX600 delivers masticating juicer function at about one-fifth the cost of the VRT350. That said, the Omega earns a meaningfully higher rating, 4.3 stars versus 3.9, suggesting buyers who spend more tend to be happier with the result. For occasional use, the EJX600 is a reasonable starting point; for daily juicing the Omega is the stronger long-term choice.
Two speeds let you match the auger pace to the produce type. A slower speed works better for soft, high-moisture fruits like oranges and tomatoes, while a faster speed handles harder items like carrots and beets more efficiently. The EJX600 offers only one fixed speed, so it handles all produce the same way regardless of texture.
The EJX600 is noticeably smaller at 3.25 by 3.25 by 12 inches, which makes it easy to tuck into a cabinet or leave on a tight counter. The Omega VRT350 weighs 18 pounds and has a larger footprint, so it tends to stay on the counter rather than get moved in and out of storage. If counter space is limited, the Elite Gourmet is the easier machine to live with day to day.
The Elite Gourmet EJX600 has over 5,300 ratings, far more than the Omega VRT350 with around 1,500. A larger review count generally means more diverse use cases represented in the feedback. The Omega's smaller but higher-rated review set, 4.3 stars, suggests a more consistently satisfied buyer, while the EJX600's 3.9-star average across a much bigger sample points to more mixed experiences, likely tied to its lower price tier.